This week as the adults should of decided what's going on in politics for a bit potentially with bye-elections that could alter who the prime minister is and representation in the House of Commons.
One thing we can't ignore is how the changing nature of internet regulation does impact on all from last years Online Safety Act to the proposed ban on social media use by those under 16 and curfews for thos between 16 and 18.
An issue with that is exactly what content that includes as while we'd all agree sexual material definately is are sites that loom at gender and sexual identity issues that have become in recent years a hot topic in schools apart from the wider community the same?
For geographic and often deep rooted cultural reasons some teens cannot discuss such topics at home for fear of being kept in, "made" to be genders and sexualities they are not, undergoing so-called conversion therapies.
To be able to access such information regarding your legal rights facing such situations is invaluable but potentially they could be restricted.
For other groups things connected around say age regression while many of would say categorically we are in no way kink connected and are harmless, for the moment it appears any action depends on your hosts reading of the requirements.
In addition we are not restricted where some other groups that may have more kink connections have either because the host has forced it upon them or sensing the way the wind is blowing they've elected to do it using providers they judge to be the least intrusive and better at keeping your data safe which has been an issue in the past.
Does Youtube need verification adding to some channels or ist that perhaps under sixteens should be locked to Youtube Kids a curated version with addition material relevant for teens on it?
No comments:
Post a Comment